Post #30757 by weatherman on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

the problem is whether the trump bump is anyhow sustainable.
yes, i have seen the countless articles of investing through changes in parties....the vast majority of those were with a split congress and usually better behaved scotus as a final backstop.

can portfolios built to withstand normal biz cycles also thrive with slow but deeply negative socio-economic changes?
what does it mean for investing when half of society accepts more widespread and escalating levels of white-collar crime, particularly from gov larders and public good? should we pro-actively consider frontier market status, which would utterly destroy the privileged currency and multiples, or keep faking it as part of the grift?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.