Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Promise Broken
Date: 01/20/25 7:58 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 8
What fun you guys can have starting Thursday. Every last thing that Trump said he would do on Day 1, if not done by Thursday, is now a lie.

What I find strange is that he doesn't appear to have learned from (or care about) one of the biggest lessons from his first term. In the federal government, if you try to go fast, you end up damaging your own policies.

Trump seems to really enjoy issuing executive orders, because they are instantaneous and unrestrained exercises of the Presidential power. The problem, though, is that you can't really change federal policy by Executive Order. Under the Administrative Procedure Act, Congress has prohibited changing federal policy without formal rule-making. That involves the government assessing the pros and cons of those changes, and undergoing a period of notice and comment, so that the federal government is fully informed about what the public thinks of potential changes before doing them. A lot of Trump's first term actions ended up getting overturned on APA grounds because he didn't want to bother with this step.

Executive Orders are not themselves subject to the APA - the President is allowed to say anything to the agencies that he wants. But the agencies won't be able to do any of these things unless and until they go through APA review. And because the EO's are out there, they damage the agencies efforts to actually follow the APA - since the policy has already been set without complying with the APA, it makes whatever they do afterwards vulnerable to legal challenge.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community