Post #24229 by ptheland on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 7

Seems accurate to me,

It's not. And in at least two different ways.

First, robbery of less than $950 is still a crime. It's a misdemeanor rather than a potential felony, but it's still a crime. You are not allowed to do it.

Second, Vice President Harris had nothing to do with it. She was Attorney General of California at the time and did not take a public position on the law change this refers to, saying it would be inappropriate for her to do while in her position as AG.

--Peter

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.