Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |
Author: SuisseBear 🐝🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: No flow
Date: 09/04/26 4:19 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 25
Every single thing Trump has ever touched turns to sh!t.

Ah well, from an economic perspective, that would depend much on your measuring stick.
If you are sitting in the White House, you'll probably consider your reign as wildly successful to date:

Income / Stakeholder Group      Net Impact                  Main Drivers                                                  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bottom 40% Net Negative Yale Budget Lab: combined OBBBA + 2025 tariffs cut bottom-
(0th-40th percentile; (largest loss) decile after-tax income ~7% (~$2,700/yr). CBO finds the bottom
deciles 1-4) two deciles net negative from OBBBA alone. Tariffs act as a
regressive consumption tax, hitting food/apparel/auto prices
hardest as a share of income; minor tax provisions (no tax on
tips/overtime) don't fully offset.

Middle 20% Net Negative Falls within the bottom 90% that Yale finds averages a net
(40th-60th percentile; (moderate) loss once tariffs and OBBBA are combined (median household
deciles 5-6) roughly -1% to -2% in recent updates). Modest individual tax
cuts are largely offset by tariff-driven price increases.

Upper-Middle 30% Net Negative Still inside the group Yale's own report describes as losing
(60th-90th percentile; (smallest loss in on net -- 'all income groups except the top decile.' Loss
deciles 7-9, roughly the bottom 90%) narrows here versus lower deciles (more benefit from OBBBA's
$105k-$220k) bracket/SALT provisions) but does not flip positive.

90th-99th percentile Modestly Positive The published +1.5% figure is an average for the ENTIRE top
(affluent, not top 1%) (smaller share of the decile (90th-100th). Gains within that decile skew toward
top decile's gain) capital and business ownership, which concentrates further up
the scale -- so the 90-99% slice likely sees a smaller gain
than the decile average suggests, even though it's nominally
'winning.' Inference from the concentration pattern, not a
direct citation.

Top 1% & Top 0.1% Net Positive Extension of top individual rates, permanent pass-through and
(disproportionate) corporate tax cuts, capital-gains-heavy income, and
deregulation-driven asset appreciation concentrate here. This
slice likely accounts for most of the top decile's +1.5%
average gain, meaning the true benefit to the top 1%/0.1%
specifically is almost certainly well above that blended
figure.

Trump Family & Direct Net Positive Major revenue growth across family ventures (real estate,
Family Enterprises (outlier magnitude) foreign licensing, media, crypto ventures like World Liberty
Financial). Driven by tax extensions, rapid deregulation, and
high-dollar foreign/private investment. Oversight reports
(e.g. House Judiciary Dems, Nov. 2025) and investigative
journalism characterize elements as self-dealing/corruption
tied to pardons and regulatory actions; the White House
disputes this, stating there are 'no conflicts of interest.'

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to SuisseBear here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (8) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community