Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |
Author: OrmontUS   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Gotta hand it to Uncle Sam
Date: 10/21/25 9:25 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
From the Financial Times:

The US army is trying to woo Wall Street as it hunts for outside capital to fund the bulk of a $150bn infrastructure revamp, according to a great scoop from my colleagues Steff Chávez and Antoine Gara.

Army secretary Daniel Driscoll told the Financial Times that he and Treasury secretary Scott Bessent met with about 15 top private capital firms last Monday — including Apollo, Carlyle, Cerberus, KKR, Advent and BDT & MSD — for a deal forum that he hopes will entice the attendees to engage in “meaty projects” with the US government.

Driscoll’s pitch was to claim to attendees that the army is sitting on underused assets across arsenals and depots. He wants private credit to help unlock value — think data centres and rare earth processing sites built on federal land — that the public sector alone would struggle to fund.

The hope is that unlocking value could help the state profit from the current AI boom and help challenge Beijing’s dominance in the production of critical minerals.
How much does the army need to raise? Driscoll is hoping they will be able to plug a $135bn gap in the balance sheet — while the service needs $150bn for infrastructure, it has just $15bn budgeted over the next decade.

“We are in a hole” that requires creative financing, he told the FT. It could, he hopes, be filled by “clever financing models or unique financing models” of the sort the firms attending the meetings are renowned for.

Jeff
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to OrmontUS here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (4) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community