No. of Recommendations: 2
This idea that the federal government is in possession of documents that they can legally hand over with respect to Jeffrey Epstein
This is the bit that -I think- is problematic. "legally hand over" implies that there's more they cannot hand over. Otherwise, why not delete that phrase, and remove any ambiguity.
Sure, some people still won't believe it. But that phrase gives them something to point at.
And, yes, I understand that there may be docs that they possess that they cannot publish (e.g. because of pending litigation). Though I don't know if that is actually the case.
