Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |
Author: Beginner ✧  😊 😞
Number: of 4769 
Subject: Re: population collapse?
Date: 01/22/24 1:01 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 16
I probably shouldn’t have replied to this post because it’s a big subject. ometimes, too heavy for me. But since I did, and to respect those who thought about it and responded, I’ll complete my thoughts. I responded to remind people that there are two sides to that coin.

How one speaks of the idea of raising or importing people into a country for work depends upon one’s position in that arrangement. No one gets to choose which side of that coin you are on. As Buffett, says, it’s a womb lottery. Since i was born on the wrong side of that coin, my own experience makes me sensitive tot he other side. It was not so harsh that I wasn’t able to eventually escape that position, but it was very difficult and cost me a lot. Some around me did not make it out alive. Being at the bottom of the economic barrel has consequences beyond the financial. Rarely do those who are on the benefitting side of things consider the totality of those on the other side. So, often the rules are set up to completely ignore the humanity, or in the case of animals, the sentient experience of those beings—they are stripped of their feelings and are often ignored as sentient beings, no different than a hammer or a nail.

I was responding to the one-dimensional phrasing that implies that people are of economic or personal “use” to “us.” That conceptual distance, defining other People, by their utility, can be dehumanizing. That “distance” is responsible for poor long-term decisions about society, and even within families. Part of humanity’s evolution to higher consciousness, I hope, is to come up with different ways to conceptualize these other people so they are not defined merely in terms of their utility to us.

I don’t know if it’s possible for humans to evolve much in that way. I only see a small part of reality. But, it doesn’t hurt to be reminded of things like that in a discussion about business and “workers,” or food, for that matter. Perhaps a bit more kindness and respect will be slipped into our thoughts and better ideas will come of it.

“Those” people are evolving, too. But for the grace… Sometimes, what goes around comes around. Life is complicated. Good to keep that in mind, I think.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Beginner here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,762 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy