Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37) |
Author: Lapsody   😊 😞
Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: Tyranny
Date: 02/10/25 1:50 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
ORDERS that, sufficient reason having been shown therefor, pending the hearing of the
States’ application for a preliminary injunction, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure, the defendants are (i) restrained from granting access to any Treasury Department
payment record, payment systems, or any other data systems maintained by the Treasury
Department containing personally identifiable information and/or confidential financial
information of payees, other than to civil servants with a need for access to perform their job
duties within the Bureau of Fiscal Services who have passed all background checks and security
clearances and taken all information security training called for in federal statutes and Treasury
Department regulations; (ii) restrained from granting access to all political appointees, special
government employees, and government employees detailed from an agency outside the
Treasury Department, to any Treasury Department payment record, payment systems, or any
other data systems maintained by the Treasury Department containing personally identifiable
information and/or confidential financial information of payees; and (iii) ordered to direct any
person prohibited above from having access to such information, records and systems but who
has had access to such information, records, and systems since January 20, 2025, to immediately
destroy any and all copies of material downloaded from the Treasury Department’s records and
systems,
if any; and further
ORDERS that any opposition submission by defendants be filed by 5 p.m. on Tuesday,
February 11, 2025; and that any reply by the States be filed by 5 p.m. on Thursday, February 13,
2025; and further

Looks like restrained from granting access. But I could be reading it wrong.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Lapsody here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community