Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m Weekly ¤Learn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: PucksFool ✧✺🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 88902 
Subject: What happened on Tuesday?
Date: 11/06/26 8:14 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
Katelyn Jetelina, writing at "Your Local Epidemiologist" made an observation and drew a conclusion that I haven't seen others make.

Substack: I’m ready. - by Katelyn Jetelina

But last night, I saw a STEM wave. More U.S. scientists and physicians ran for state and federal office this cycle than ever before. And many won:

A pediatrician in South Carolina
A public health physician in Michigan
A microbiologist in Georgia
A nuclear engineer in Virginia
A physician and former State Health Officer in Ohio
An ER nurse in Wisconsin
An environmental engineer in Iowa
A mathematician in Illinois
A physician in New Jersey
A pediatrician in California
The United States said clearly: Health matters. Science matters. Integrity matters. Empathy matters. People matter.

But let’s not forget: change matters. Many of these candidates weren’t focused on defense or the status quo. And rightfully so. We cannot go back to 2019. We cannot go back to 2024. The health ecosystem was not working for people. It was built for another time and has failed everyone for years. We need an alternative path forward from the one we’ve been on for the past 20 years, and the one we're on now.

This means it’s time for something bigger than repair. It’s not just about putting the pieces back together; it’s about reimagining what’s possible, and, quite frankly, what’s needed.


Change matters. I listen to a couple of financial/economic podcasts. One of the things that I've heard over the past year or two is that people who are nearing retirement age are continuing to work not so much for the wages as they are for the health benefits. I've read that the history of health benefits being tied to a person's job goes back to WW2. Maybe it made sense then; it doesn't now. Change matters.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to PucksFool here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy