Post #35611 by albaby1 on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 8

None of them were charged after the statute of limitations ran out and zero of them were charged with bullsh1t felonies.

Even if true, it doesn't mean that someone can be indicted when they haven't committed even the misdemeanor.

Again, that's the difference. Mayorkas won't get prosecuted because he hasn't done anything that's criminalized in Texas. Trump was prosecuted because he committed a criminal act in New York - and regardless of whether there are legal arguments that he can raise on appeal about how the statute of limitation should have been calculated or whether the legal reasoning behind the felony charge was sound, it's that underlying criminal act that is necessary for a prosecution to get started.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (23)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.