No. of Recommendations: 13
Here is what you said, I think the more recent example of this, the 16 "nobel prize economist" letter (more crap from supposedly experts) shows that they continue the same playbook of lying to support their guy.
You said they were lying, and you've now seen the letter with their references - so without researching their references you couldn't know it was a lie, but just assumed for your political convenience.
All the talk about variables, etc, means nothing since you put forth no effort to understand what they considered.
So it appears you fibbed about their lying and think you can artfully BS your way through this. Sounds normal.
