Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25) |
Author: sykesix   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: OT: Welp, I done did it this time
Date: 08/19/25 2:18 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
hey - it was a great way to go out......

"Better to burn out than to fade away."


There was definitely some of that. TMF gets a lot of criticism for their moderation being arbitrary. I don't think that's the case at all. They've always been pretty consistent. Whenever I've seen a post that has been pulled or had one of my own pulled the reason is always apparent. People complain about getting their posts pulled all the time, but I'd say in 98% of the cases they knew or should have known exactly where the red line was.

In this case I was 100% sure :) I get why TMF wants a family friendly environment. But the audience is a group of adults who have known each other in a virtual sense for basically ever and mostly quality for Social Security. If we can't talk about "Moby Dick" and "sperm whales" the nanny filter just might be set a notch too high.

So I wrote out a post channeling my inner Auntie Lydia explaining why the rules are important, not just because they are rules. It is because the rules teach discipline. Something along those lines. Then I signed it TMFMints. But I thought about it for a few minutes before I posted it. If I didn't sign it, it might have skated under the radar. If I did sign it, I was 100% they were going to pull it. But I thought it was way funnier signed. I thought couple of people might get a laugh before it was pulled. And no one reads old posts anyway, so why not? And hey, turnabout is fair play. So I said "screw it." The TMF nanny filter is absurd, so using absurdity to point that out should be within the rules. After all, TMF was founded on the idea of the jester using absurdity to tell the truth. And if someone gets a laugh out of it, then it is a win-win.

This line of reasoning did not resonate with TMF.

They pulled my post along with a few others which I expected. I did not expect the ban hammer. But I crossed the red line on purpose. I messed around and found out.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to sykesix here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community