Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (72) |
Author: Goofyhoofy 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: If RFK gets confirmed ,
Date: 12/14/24 7:50 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 16
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive.

So true.

That’s what I think about speed limits. if we didn’t have those I could just zoom around at any hyper velocity through the neighborhood. I am oppressed because I can’t save the time I need to do other things. Stop taking care of me with your stupid laws.

Maybe I want to inspect my own food. I certainly do not need government bureaucrats doing something I don’t want them doing in the first place! Who appointed them, anyway? Oh, right, the tyrannical oppressors protecting me from myself. Well who needs it!

And housing codes! Whose business is it whether my house falls down on me or not? Just mine, period. Stupid city council trying to protect me from myself - and raising the cost of my house to boot. End It Now!

We would be a lot better off if we didn’t regulate medicine: you would see an explosion of cures for things which don’t exist now. Sure, some of them might not work, but the free market would take care of that in its own way (creative death, I call it).

And requiring accountants and lawyers and investment counselors to subscribe to an ethics code? Who needs it? Surely the tiny fraction of dishonest lawyers would be revealed quickly and shut out of the profession without onerous regulation requiring them to operate transparently in the interest of their clients, right?

Oh, you could go through everything in our modern life and see that we’d be so much better off without this tyranny of do-gooders. If I want to be a victim, I should be allowed to be. Period.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Goofyhoofy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (72) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community