Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", sykesix asked the members: "What do you do if you arrive early at movie besides go to the snack bar?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) |
Author: albaby1 ✶❂🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 88933 
Subject: Re: AI: Better an empty lot than a data center
Date: 11/10/26 3:58 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 16
That's true for literally any construction project.

Yep - but you'd rather not have it than have it, if you live nearby. Especially on data center scale.

You can mitigate noise directionally.

Not successfully. These things are massive, and it's very hard to create noise buffers even for far quieter uses than datacenters.

I popped over to google maps, and this property has residential development literally across the street on two sides. It a client came to me with even conventional low-impact light industrial, such as a warehouse use, I would tell them that they would have a hard time getting it approved. This is not a parcel that wants to be light-industrial. It especially does not want to be data center light industrial which operates at night. Data centers are uses that belong in the same sorts of areas that light industrial and industrial parks are generally found - separated from existing or proposed residential by either large barriers (like rivers or large limited access highways) or with transitioning uses, like commercial and office. And they need to be on parcels large enough to have material setbacks in order to provide sufficient buffering.

Of course this project generated massive opposition. A data center at that location would have been terrible land use planning.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 88,852 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (17) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community | Privacy