What Ackman highlights isn’t just one dispute, it’s one example of a much broader problem with the system where it’s cheap to threaten litigation but expensive to fight it, leading companies to settle again and again, even when claims are weak.

Living in Florida, we’ve seen first hand how this plays out. FL once generated ~80% of all U.S. homeowners insurance lawsuits while accounting for < 10% of claims, and home insurance premiums exploded as a result. The previous racket was roofing companies teaming up with lawyers to sue insurance companies for, what were in many cases, weak/frivolous claims they wouldn't have otherwise paid out.

And the exact same thing happened with auto insurance. Lawyers took advantage of FL's mandated $10K personal injury protection insurance to file countless frivolous lawsuits, driving auto insurance rates to the highest in the country while the lawyers enrich themselves. Thankfully, the trend has finally slowed and started reversing after legislation that has put some common sense restraints, but that's just one state tackling this beast.

And what Ackman is describing is a less visible, but no less insidious, issue that also becomes a tax on consumers - because companies don’t just absorb the legal costs of lawsuits like these, they pass them on.

Collectively, this results in higher insurance premiums, higher prices of products, and lower wages for all over time. Nationwide, the US tort system is estimated to cost the over $500B/yr. That translates to ~$4,000 per household!

Not all of that is abuse, but if even part of that is driven by low-merit, settlement-pressure claims, that’s potentially thousands per year in hidden costs consumers are likely having to absorb.

In other words: this isn’t just a legal issue, it’s a quiet, ongoing tax on everyday families.

Nationwide tort reform is desperately needed to stop this trend from worsening.