Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32) |
Author: WatchingTheHerd   😊 😞
Number: of 84353 
Subject: Re: Weisselberg's Perjury Plea Deal
Date: 02/02/24 11:56 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 12
I wonder if this could cause Judge Engoron to delay, and perhaps increase, his fine assessment in the Trump organization fraud case brought by AG Letitia James in New York.

Perhaps it is the reason he deferred setting a final penalty. It's very difficult to put a final number to a penalty for a 30+ year crime wave whose bottom has not necessarily been plumbed.

First, the November 2023 news about $40 million dollars in various cash transfers between Trump personal and Trump corporate accounts that were not shared with the court appointed monitor.

Then the January 2024 news about a $48 million dollar "loan" that Trump appeared to fabricate between himself and a shell company of his tied to his Chicago Trump Tower that had ZERO paperwork identifying terms, rates, etc. The head legal counsel for Trump Organization may also find himself in legal trouble because in refuting any impropriety, he didn't even get the story straight. Trump himself alleged the loan was from Trump the persion to the Trump shell. The company's chief legal counsel argued back to the monitor it was the exact opposite -- the shell company lent the money to Trump. WHAAAAAAAT? It's a really good idea when you are on trial for fraud, have already lost other fraud trials and are facing multiple CRIMINAL trials to get your defendant's story straight in court.

Now finding Trump's CFO is pleading guilty to additional perjury in testimony regarding the accounting practices involved in all of these scams? Not a good look to present to a judge deciding on a nine digit civil penalty.

WTH
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to WatchingTheHerd here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community