Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (102) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84350 
Subject: Re: As Albaby says...
Date: 01/14/26 11:02 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Mexico does not export a lot anymore. The previous Mexican administration decided to build up domestic refining capacity, rather than importing refined products from the US, so there is progressively less crude to export. When Trump the Great and Perfect imposed his tariffs last spring, Canadian crude was exempt, but Mexican was not. Mexico pivoted to exporting to other countries. Canada cannot pivot to exporting to other countries, because much of their oil is landlocked. If the US regime issued an edict that only Venezuelan heavy sour be imported, the pipelines from Canada be cut off, the Canadian oil, some 2Mbpd, would, effectively, be off the global market.

In the short run. In the longer run, if the U.S. displaces Canadian imports of oil, Canada will simply build up the capacity to move more of it to the West Coast for export. In during the interim, China can simply look to pick up any slack capacity from Russia, especially if India has to reduce some of their Russian imports in order to paper over a trade agreement with the U.S.

I know that your investing thesis is that the U.S. is going to shortly take action to drive up the price of oil so that Trump can repay his Big Oil donors for supporting his campaign. I think it's far more likely that Trump stiffs his Big Oil donors to keep oil prices low and is in no way going to go out and bomb Kharg Island.

[BTW, I know you're expecting something like this to happen any day - but even if we were thinking of bombing Kharg Island, he'd almost certainly wait until the USS Ford supercarrier group returned from their field trip to Venezuela. We removed our aircraft carrier from the Middle East, and for the time being the Fifth Fleet doesn't have an aircraft carrier group. So, while I don't think we would do that in any circumstances, it's certainly not happening in the near future.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (102) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community