Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: Oops, Wrongly Deported Maryland Father
Date: 04/01/25 12:35 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 12
Fine. Drive his a$$ over a border or two to Guatemala or something.

But they can't. Because they didn't afford him any opportunity to point out that what the government was actually doing violated the terms of the prior rulings....which were issued because deporting him to El Salvador would have violated federal law.

So because they didn't bother to allow any process that would have caught the violation before deporting him, they now have no way of correcting it. He's out of our jurisdiction. Which, again, is why just countries don't do this.

This case should make you more worried about what's going on here, not less. Because this was the easiest mistake to avoid. The prior ruling was in his file; there's no evidence that the ruling was lost or misplaced or not recorded. Even the simplest, most cursory review of his records would have indicated that he should not have been put on that plane - but they did it anyway. The easiest mistake not to make.

So this should make you less comfortable that the government got the harder judgment calls right - that all those people who were disappeared based on eyeballing their tattoos or informants or whatever were all correctly identified. This mistake should make you worry that this operation was not overly concerned with getting the details right, but prioritized speed and numbers over being accurate. If these guys can't be trusted to get the answer right in a case where the answer is written down for them in the file, you shouldn't trust them to have gotten all their gang identifications right, either.

Which, again, is why we have the rule of law and due process - so that someone is checking their work to make sure mistakes don't happen. The fact that they made a mistake on an easier case, rather than the other types of cases that people are very worried about, shouldn't make you more comfortable. It should make you angry and upset at your government.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (29) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community