Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20) |
Author: tedthedog   😊 😞
Number: of 21944 
Subject: Re: Operating earnings
Date: 11/05/23 9:01 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3

Sorry for the newbie questions, these aren't criticisms, I'm just trying to follow the accounting discussions in more detail than I have previously:

Why worry about values off peak for RRs?
In general, point statistics like "off-peak" seem less informative than e.g. "off-trend"
What was the peak? Was it some weird one-off spike, or was it simply the high of a generally wavy graph?

From the report:
"The decreases were primarily attributable to lower overall freight volumes and higher non-fuel operating costs, partially offset by lower fuel costs."
Is that all the explanation we get, i.e. volume (which you were potentially attributing to cyclical) and "higher non-fuel operating costs"?

If cyclical, shouldn't other RR's show similar?

Seems odd that "non-fuel operating costs" had a big impact. What could cause that in a RR i.e. examples of such costs?

Utilities:
> is certainly the $1.6bn year to date in liability provisions for the 2020 wildfires.
As a newbie, I know companies can set aside 'provisions' and this shows under 'current liabilities', that's what you meant?

> That leaves the sum of real operating earnings among the "steady" things I track -1.7% off their peak instead of -8.7% off their peak.
Given your initial comment "The falloffs in earnings within the utilities and rails are quite depressing", I gather this is a strawman optimist view? IOW, under the assumptions made, it ain't so bad -- but one can certainly question those assumptions.

A newbie question
> leaving BNSF with the least well run customers
How does that impact operating BNSF earnings?

> Oh boy, as to BNSF and PSR...a lot of stuff going on in the railroad business these days
What kind of stuff?
Regarding your comment about "manipulatd prices", you mean buybacks and use of debt and stuff by other RRs, while Berkshire continues to be just a solid workhorse? So, you're not worried/depressed about BRK holdings?

For other newbies to rail, PSR is Precision Scheduled Railroading
iclsystems.com - Qa series introduction to precision scheduled railroading

Wouldn't there be significant capex to change to PSR e.g. locomotives, huge new software packages etc?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to tedthedog here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (20) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community