Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |
Author: Dope1   😊 😞
Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: Texiera on what the d's should do
Date: 03/25/2025 4:14 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
No, it didn't. Whoever emailed her the information removed it from the secure SCIF.

She's the SecState.
Besides, according to you upthread, Marco Rubio needs to be in jail. Why no Herself, then?

No, it's not - or rather, it's not exclusively under the Executive Branch's purview.

Congress has very specific foreign policy roles. They ratify treaties. That's about it. Day to day foreign policy machinations are the exclusive purview of the exec branch.

That's why there exist laws and statutes governing classified information! Why the Congress has Foreign Affairs committees and Defense Committees in both Chambers!

Ooo, exclamation points! Do these people classify information?

Why we had all of those hearings on Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi!

Because Hillary! was and is a moron, and her State Department inadequately protected a US Ambassador and his station resulting in his death, the death of the security team and a US facility being overrun.

Foreign policy is not the sole and exclusive purview of the Executive Branch.

It absolutely is. The word you're looking for is "oversight", which Congress can do.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (127) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds