Post #21684 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

She tossed the case because she didn't think the Attorney General (and thereby the President) had ENOUGH control over the actions of the counsel, calling into question the legitimacy of any action taken by the Special Counsel because he was not appointed by the President or confirmed by the Senate. - WTH

-----------------

Would you favor a system where an AG can pick a random civilian citizen and grant him the powers of a US Prosecutor backed by the treasury of the United Stated. Would you feel different if Garland had just picked Dope and set him loose. I kinda like that image.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (11)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.