Post #7007 by sano on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (53)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

How did you conclude that my suggestion that applying some serious consequences to his escalating criminal behavior along the way would not have prevented him from being on the street to commit his homicide?

I did not conclude that. I agree that locking him up is a sure thing while he's locked up. If we locked up everybody with a violent conviction the incarceration expense would rival, if not exceed, the military budget. It would be more cost effective to go biblical; simply amputate the hands of violent people. I was thinking a few fingers because how could the perp handle ammo; right? But my wife says stump'em at the wrist so they cannot bludgeon women with baseball bats.

I merely suggested that if firearms were WELL REGULATED, that may have prevented your guy from obtaining a gun that may very easily have been stolen.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (53)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.