Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (160) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Trump To Allow Crypto In 401K's...
Date: 08/07/25 11:39 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 23
401(k)s are about YOUR retirement. If your risk tolerance is such that you want to pile into crypto and potentially go nuts with it, have at it.

But like with all investment vehicles you bear 100% of the risk and if it goes south…no bailout for you.


But that's not what happens. Which is why we don't let people do things that are self-destructive beyond certain limits. Because there are always externalities and consequences that aren't limited solely to the person who makes bad investment decisions.

Because when people are experiencing extreme poverty, it's makes life worse for everyone. It makes the society worse. When you have to pay more for shelters and food banks and for police to clean out parks and libraries filled with homeless people, when emergency rooms get clogged with folks who are unable to care for their basic needs, when families have to take in an elderly parent or relative because they blew their retirement funds on inappropriate investment vehicles....it never stays contained with the people who made the bad decision.

For better or worse, modern society is not a collection of atomized individuals who are separated by distance because we're primarily agrarian homesteaders and yeoman landowners. It's not like colonial days where you if you had a "work/save or starve" choice, it was only you that suffered if you ended up with "starve." That's not where we are any more. That's why we have these systems that impose some constraints on individual freedom - because we've lived through what happens when you don't, and the consequences are rarely limited just to the people who make the bad choices. So we don't let people make every bad choice they might possibly want to make.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (160) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community