Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: 2 more Chinese bioterror arrests
Date: 11/06/25 6:44 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 4
You're aware of a domestic black market in roundworms?

Sigh. "Those folks" meaning the black market pet importers in my hypothetical - not the UM researchers. The point I'm making is that not everyone who violates animal import control laws has to be one of either: i) hapless innocent who has violated it by inadvertence; or ii) bioterrorist. So that if I point out, "huh, no indication these people at UM were bioterrorists" that does not mean that they have to be hapless innocents. They might have been deliberately violating the animal control laws - just not for terrorism.

I get that it's fun and all to argue semantics to such a degree that the debate devolves into What The Definition Of Is Is but I think the larger picture around people not smuggling things into the United States that they shouldn't - especially from China - is by far the more interesting thing to discuss.

I mean - maybe? Again, these folks were all actual biological researchers who were scholars at a research university doing biological research. The simplest explanation is probably the most plausible one - these guys genuinely wanted the roundworms so they could do research on them, and it was easier (they thought) to just smuggle them in rather than follow proper channels (if proper channels exist). Not that they intended to commit any kind of bioterrorism or use them as a bioweapon.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (54) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community