Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24) |
Author: mungofitch 🐝🐝🐝 GOLD
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 21944 
Subject: Re: Value Trend
Date: 05/03/23 4:34 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
The value shown as of the end of 2020 of 409719 looks to be inconsistent with the value shown in the chart at www.stonewellfunds.com/PriceAndWMAofValue.png. I'm sure that it's not, and that I'm just reading the chart wrong, but could you please help me?

I haven't delved into it, but it's the same method.
The two most likely differences are
* I probably used a different multiplier constant. The rate of change of increase should be the same between the two summaries.
* This is a different year, with a difference CPI level, so the inflation adjustment to the level of 2023 dollars gives different numbers.
Again, it should be the same slope with a slightly different final multiplier.

For any given analysis, just make sure that the prices are adjusted for inflation with the same final CPI number as the value estimates : )
It doesn't matter which date--which size of dollars--you use as long as it's consistent between the two.

Speaking of currency effect adjustments---
Though I'm sure nobody cares, I don't track my portfolio or net worth in US dollars.
The dollar itself is a bit volatile cyclically.
I calculate my portfolio value in dollars, then also convert it to euros, and take the simple average of the two numbers for each date.
The biggest currency movements are usually one of those two (usually the dollar), so the midpoint is a much better track of true purchasing power over time.
I nicknamed the simple average "mid Atlantic currency units", or MACU.
It sounds bizarre, but it gives a much less volatile and (I believe) more meaningful result.
No matter who you are or where you live, if the dollar tanks for a couple of years then a mattress full of euros has more purchasing power than a mattress full of dollars.
And vice versa, of course.
For a sense of the swings in the US dollar, check out this graph.
stockcharts.com: SharpCharts | StockCharts.com
The US dollar index is the level of the dollar relative to all its trading partners, which is in effect a measure of the dollar movements since the average of all others can be considered a constant.
There is a big difference between the purchasing power implied by level 72 and the purchasing power implied by level 114.

Jim
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to mungofitch here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community