Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: The immigration debate is over'
Date: 10/04/23 6:56 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
The immigrants I know tend NOT to be sympathetic to "illegals". Granted, a very small dataset. I know a few Latino immigrants, and a lot of Asian ones. Almost without exception, they support legal immigration. Most also seem to support applying for asylum, since many know that third-world countries can be dangerous places (wars, gangs, cartels, political imprisonment or assassination, etc). Even the harshest of those folks wouldn't have approved of separating families.

But I think all of them would be in favor of a reform. Nothing that would allow everyone a free pass, but something that establishes a sensible migrant worker system/visa**. My ex-employer utilized a e-verify system run by USCIS to make sure all employees were legal at all times. Expanding that to make it a requirement for all employers doesn't seem that much of a stretch. From what I know of my immigrant former colleagues views, they had no problem with that.

I think a few of them were in favor of "The Wall", but most were not because they realized it just wouldn't work (and would cost way too much, to boot). But even then, that would have been coupled with sensible reforms.

I know you live in a household that likely has some strong opinions. Am I wrong in thinking that they would be along similar lines?

I think it somewhat ironic that if the Republicans softened on immigration, supported reforms, they would get a LOT of new voters. Latinos tend to be pretty conservative, most coming from Catholic backgrounds. They mostly agree with Republican morality stances, just not immigration in particular.

**There already is one, but that system is cumbersome and inefficient.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community