Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: How Deficits Work...
Date: 05/22/23 3:33 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 0
I can't think of anything worse than somebody who works for 40 years, saves a ton of money for retirement, does everything right to live the Good Life only to have the feds say, gimme more.

Sure. We don't want to target someone like that. If he worked 40 years, paid his taxes all that time (assuming a reasonable variable rate based on income), he shouldn't get whacked. Likely your worker will have lower income, and pay less tax on dividends and capital gains, so that's fine. That's pretty much the situation I'm in now (except I only worked for ~30 years).

So how about this: A micro transaction tax on all stock trades where the asset has not been held over X period of time?

OK. Maybe less than a week? I knew a "day trader" (he worked at my company as his day job), and he said you wanted to be out of a position by the end of the day. So he would start buying when the market opened, and would be sold out of everything by market close. Though I don't really see why we don't just tax that as ordinary income. All stock gains, all dividends. Just tally it up with any salaries, stock plans (a lot of big-wigs get paid in stock), etc, and tax it at an appropriate progressive rate.

And when the Gateses die, their kids should have to pay tax on the value of the estate. A lot of wealth gets handed-down tax-free because it's never actually liquidated to "realize" any gains. Exceptions made for smaller estates (e.g. family farms, probably you and me and everyone posting here, etc).

Just hand-wavy. Details would need to be hammered out, obviously. But, unfortunately, our system assures that Congress is in the pockets of those uber-wealthy (bribes...errr..."campaign contributions"), and the wealthy wouldn't like taxes touching them. As one of them once said, "only little people pay taxes". And she was right, the wealthy have fixed the system so that is mostly true.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (21) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community