Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
 Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy❤
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |
Author: albaby1 ✶🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD   😊 😞
Number: of 48485 
Subject: Re: E Jean Carroll
Date: 01/15/2025 2:08 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 2
Based on what albaby was saying about the other conviction, no court wants to have jurisdiction over a president because of the legal complications. Well, that court has jurisdiction until $5M are paid, correct? What about that?

They don't want criminal jurisdiction over the President - because criminal jurisdiction carries with it a lot of power over the defendant that is probably incompatible with the allocation of powers under the Constitution. But that wouldn't apply to civil jurisdiction, and the Clinton cases already held that the courts can exercise the more limited civil jurisdiction even against a sitting President.

Whether she will ever see a dime is another matter.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (3) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds