Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: In view of what's happening in Cali
Date: 05/06/26 7:16 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 3
IF both parties of self-dealing grifters acted in concert to do what is best for the nation, WHO is going to stop them, the homeless?

The same people who have stopped every other effort to close loopholes, whether the carried interest loophole or attempts to get rid of the stepped-up basis. Rich people, lobbyists, special interests, and plain old inertia - to say nothing of the many folks who believe it is bad policy to finance the government using these kinds of taxes.

You believe big money owns and controls both parties? Progressive Dems don't really support taxing the superrich?

I believe that both parties have a lot of institutional and other incentives not to aggressively change the tax code to bring in more money by taxing the superrich.

The GOP is obvious - there's huge tranches of that party that are based on hating spending, and part of hating spending is hating taxation.

The Democrats is less obvious, but approximately 61 of the party's 212 House members are from CA and NY. About 30% of the party. Silicon Valley and Wall Street. Those states have huge incentives to keep the billionaire classes happy and stable where they are. Nothing so overt as being "owned or controlled," but also that almost all the individuals who are in positions of power within the party would find it difficult to stand up to concerted opposition of the industries that power their state's GDP. It's the same reason the Democrats don't aggressively take on unions - not that the party is owned or controlled by unions, but that any single individual legislator will find it rough sledding if the unions want to get them out.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (50) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community