Post #12496 by commonone on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (18)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 4

albaby1: That might be worth it - I was just pushing back on the idea that there's some value for her to stay in the race as an "emergency back-up candidate" to Trump. Again, unless he keels over very soon, that's just not going to happen for Haley.

Actually, there's one more reason for Haley to stay in for a while longer: 1A) The Supreme Court has scheduled oral arguments to begin next month on the Colorado Supreme Court’s previous ruling, which found that Trump is an insurrectionist and he is therefore ineligible to appear on a ballot. 1B) That, and the high court might also decline to take up an anticipated federal appeals court decision denying Trump’s claim that he is immune from prosecution for anything he did as president.

In short, it is still possible that Trump may be ineligible to appear on several state's ballots and at least one major trial may be concluded this summer.

Fingers crossed.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (18)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.