Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |
Author: OrmontUS   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: Planned Obsolescence
Date: 12/25/25 2:12 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Until when your printer was being produced, printers competed on their durability. It created a scenario where the companies were in a death spiral of competing with each other on price. Some brainiac, all of a sudden, realized that they were no longer in the printer business - they were in the chemical business (supplies). They could give you the printer for free and still come out smelling like a rose if you used it.

This bred an on-going battle with third-party unofficial supply source. The “best” way to address this was, after the initial milking of a printer family for supply bucks until they were reverse engineered, was to make the printer crappy enough that it would fail shortly afterwards - forcing the user to buy another printer for next-to-no dollars. The current subscription plans make this semi-automatic and “sticky”.

Virtually all consumer-grade printers follow some semblance of this model today. Commercial printers (office workhorses) reverse this by selling relatively expensive printers with lower cost-per-page for supplies.

The most effective way to choose between “equal” printers (of any sort) is to do a Total Cost of Ownership calculation.

This starts by evaluating the duty-cycle of the printer (verify that it is based, for example, by printing its monthly duty cycle for three years before needing a major overhaul) against what your projected printing is going to be, then calculate the cost of supplies for that period and add any periodic maintenance is required.

“Back in the day” I was able to demonstrate that there were huge savings (in the thousands of dollars) to a school to buy two rather expensive high-speed color laser printers compared to four $80 ink jet printers. They couldn’t justify the laser printers (capital budget), but were thrilled by the prospect of buying such cheap color inkjet printers (operating budget picked up the supply costs).

This is not an unusual progression. My first electric typewriter purchase was a standard IBM Selectric that I bought used at an auction for around $800 and then bought an annual service contract from IBM. Today, an “equivalent” (not really) is under 100 bucks. My first fax machine was bought used for $1,200, weighed nearly 100 pounds and was the size of a large laser printer. A fax machine today can be lifteed with one hand and costs around $60.

That said, things do frequently get more sophisticated as well as cheaper given enough time. My first PC had 16K of RAM, used a 40 character green-screen TV and had a tape recorder for storage (Steve would recognize this puppy) and my first wrist watch didn’t have a barometer, altimeter, thermometer or compass built into it.

Jeff
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to OrmontUS here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (12) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community