Post #46489 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Shrewd'm.com

A merry & shrewd investing community

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤

Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week! ¤

Search Politics

Try visiting boards you don't normally visit, starting with the 'All Boards' link above. Or request a new board by posting to 'Any Missing Board Requested Here'.

- Manlobbi

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Prev | Next

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

Not that judges were considering doing it - Democrats in Congress have proposed it:

That would give the judiciary some teeth (which I complained they didn't a few weeks ago). But Dems will have to have a veto-proof majority support to get it done. Seems unlikely until at least 2028, and I'm not sure what of the Constitution will still exist at that point.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (6)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Ticker or Board Name Author

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.