Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (136) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84349 
Subject: Re: January 6, Part Deux
Date: 02/04/26 11:07 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
That being said, one of ICE's favorite places to grab people, over the past year, is at immigration court, when people are complying with the law by showing up for their hearing on their asylum claim. I am not going to say that scenario is impossible, because we have seen so many things happen over the last several years, that would have been deemed impossible, in the late 70s.

They show up at immigration court because there's lots of undocumented folks there. Undocumented people have to go to immigration court. It's a target-rich environment, so they can make their quota of detaining as many folks as possible. I mean, sure - they're grabbing mostly rules-compliant and otherwise law-abiding folks (the ones who voluntarily show up for hearings). But that's so much easier than going after violent criminals! It's just efficient!

But that's not true at a polling place. There's little reason for people who are undocumented to go there. Even if you subscribe to conservative fever dreams about the undocumented voting in large numbers, they're pretty unlikely to do that via in-person election day voting, rather than other methods.

And I think you're wrong about the late 1970's. Those folks were in the immediate aftermath of Watergate and ABSCAM - I doubt there's much going on today they would have thought impossible. At best unlikely, but certainly within the realm of possibility. Other than the Russia stuff.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (136) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community