Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (47) |
Author: commonone   😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Inheriting a far more dangerous world
Date: 09/24/24 10:15 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 25
bighairymike: The venerable WSJ nails it. ... The Taliban control the country and are reimposing feudal Islamist rule.

Well, perhaps we should blame the guy who negotiated directly with the Taliban in nine rounds of talks over 18 months -- at one point, he secretly invited the Taliban to the presidential retreat at Camp David on the eve of the anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks -- ignoring the Afghan government, to strike the Doha Agreement: DonOLD Trump.

Trump agreed to release 5,000 Taliban prisoners.

This deal required taking the Taliban’s promises on faith since the peace agreement came with no enforcement mechanism for the Taliban to keep its word.

Overall, it was a pretty good deal for the Taliban, critics said. “Trump all but assured the future course of events would reflect the Taliban’s interests far more than the United States,” Miller writes. H.R. McMaster, Trump’s second national security adviser, has recently called it “a surrender agreement with the Taliban.” Another member of Trump’s National Security Council said it was “a very weak agreement.”

Facts are pesky things.

washingtonpost.com - Trump peace deal taliban

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to commonone here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (47) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community