Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 21944 
Subject: Re: movies
Date: 03/12/26 11:56 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
I so enjoyed this movie, I was surprised it wasn’t a bigger hit.

I remember seeing the trailers and thinking it would have problems. Rom-coms haven't done well at the box office for quite a while for a lot of cultural and sociological reasons (we've run out of reasons to keep the couple separate in the first act so they can struggle to get together by the third act). High-concept rom-com is an even harder sell. Though the high-concept can solve some of the structural rom-com problems, the central hook here ("what if the Beatles never existed?") doesn't do that - the "what if" premise doesn't actually keep them apart.

I watched a bit of it, but couldn't get out of my own head about how ridiculous the underlying premise was, so I didn't enjoy it at all and stopped watching shortly after the Ed Sheeran parts. My fault entirely, of course. I couldn't get past how it didn't make sense that anyone in a modern musical culture where the Beatles didn't exist in the sixties would want to hear "new to them" Beatles songs fifty years later, and that the film had no interest in interrogating that. A "new" Beatles song introduced into the world of 2020 wouldn't be applauded - it would sound dated, out-of-touch and derivative. The Beatles were the Beatles because they were revolutionary and visionary and groundbreaking and a cultural phenomenon rooted in the time of their creative output, and they changed music. Most "alt-history" high-concept stuff tries to play with the idea that the change that created the "alt" part has actual repercussions in the world, but Yesterday is entirely premised on the idea that the "alt" event absolutely does not.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 977 posts about Atheist Shrewds. The article-length ones it recommended most:
10 Commandments display blocked in Arkansas · 31 recs · 2026
At this time of Christmas · 26 recs · 2025
Huckabees, please · 14 recs · 2026
Welcome · 12 recs · 2024
Smart people · 11 recs · 2026
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (25) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community