Post #30612 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

The majority of voters are more concerned about the economy, crime, and border security.

Then why would you vote for the convicted felon? Border security is the only one that the convict made a difference (and it was inhumane, mostly, and often struck down by the courts). You have made those three talking points, and we have given you data "over and over" that indicate you were wrong. Apparently you dismissed it, or that wasn't really your reason.

I will agree that an evil/criminal candidate is paramount. And, apparently, I'm in the minority in considering that disqualifying. And I will proudly declare that I never voted for a known rapist or convicted felon (from any party). As recently as maybe 20 years ago, I would have been in the majority in regarding that as disqualifying.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (32)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.