Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37) |
Author: commonone   😊 😞
Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: The courts can't seem to stop him
Date: 03/17/25 12:09 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
ges: ...granting himself sweeping wartime powers to deport noncitizens—without due process...

So we have a convicted felon who believes he should be the last word on our laws and their enforcement -- which kinda' sorta' sounds unconstitutional -- and despite Judge Boasberg agreeing with the ACLU that the terms of the Alien Enemies Act apply only to “enemy nations” and temporarily blocking deportations under it, the Trump White House defied the judge's order and declined to turn the planes around and return the men.

And then after last night claiming they had not "defied" the judge, this morning ICE Administrator Homan said: "We're not stopping. I don't care what the judges think. I don't care what the left thinks. We're coming."

And that kinda' sorta' sounds like contempt.

No doubt this is the case that the Trump White House wants in front to the Supreme Court, rolling the dice to make himself King or dictator, or whichever title you prefer. He clearly looking for the high court to give him the power to arrest, detain, and deport all migrants over the age of 14 without due process, as well as the power to determine who is a gang member without due process.

BTW, we have no evidence that the men deported were gang members, and now they have vanished into a gulag outside the reach of the American justice system.

Of course we'll all argue that the Trump White House would never be so emboldened to disappear journalists or critics or trans individuals or gays or... on second thought, we're entered unchartered territory and all bets are off.

And even if the Supreme Court turns aside King Donald and rules against him, would this not be the perfect situation for him to defy the high court? And then what? Will republicans in Congress have the courage to bring articles of impeachment or will the grand experiment end?

My money is not on congressional republicans.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to commonone here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (37) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community