Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |
Author: OrmontUS   😊 😞
Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: Multiplex order in Pacific Ocean
Date: 10/31/25 1:45 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 6
The description is over-simplified in that it ignores the prevalence of pirates and brigands along the routes, especially at its borders. Take a look at any of the caravansaries along the silk road for a clue as to the safety of traders who joined caravans for their mutual protection.

As far as China is concerned, to the best of my knowledge, they have not fought a major war since the Korean conflict over 70 years ago. That's not because they are incapable of winning a conflict, but because fighting an expensive and disruptive war is counter to their interests. It is my belief that China would have as much military damage from the US if it took Taiwan as the US would suffer from China if it took Greenland. Neither country can afford to directly target the other militarily. The dangers to both would be economic in the form of sanctions from the target country's allies.

In the meantime, China is OK with Taiwan being an autonomous portion of their country as the amount of profitable trade between the two is huge. The only thing which would precipitate an attack is if Taiwan was about to become militarily strong enough to deny China the ability to easily invade in the future. Similarly, as long as trade is profitable to China, there is no reason for China to invade any of their neighbors.

Jeff
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to OrmontUS here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (2) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community