Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |
Author: Steve203 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84359 
Subject: Re: My moves in France
Date: 07/18/26 8:15 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 1
Not sure I agree but I certainly will think about that opinion.

I asked the net sifter if Macron was a supply sider:

Yes, French President Emmanuel Macron is widely considered a supply-sider. His economic policy has been fundamentally built on supply-side economics, focusing on structural reforms to make France more competitive, incentivize investment, and encourage job creation.

Corporate and Capital Tax Cuts: Lowering the corporate tax rate and capping taxes on investment income (implementing a flat tax of 30%) to encourage capital deployment.

Wealth Tax Reform: Abolishing France's traditional wealth tax (ISF) and replacing it with a real estate tax (IFI) to prevent capital flight and stimulate investment.

Labor Market Overhaul: Introducing structural labor reforms (often referred to as "flexicurity") designed to give companies more flexibility in hiring and firing, thereby reducing structural unemployment

Pro-Business Reforms: Pursuing deregulation and actively promoting a "startup nation" to attract foreign direct investment and foster innovation.


Bottom line: take from the Proles in job security and retirement. Give tax cuts, and deregulation to the "JCs".

And, in the UK: more taking from the Proles chronic underfunding of the national health system under the Tories, from a per-capita starting point that was half what is spent in the US.

from the net sifter:

Yes, healthcare experts, economists, and public accounts committees widely argue that the Conservative governments (2010–2024) systematically underfunded the National Health Service (NHS).

While the nominal budget technically increased, the rate of spending growth slowed significantly compared to historical averages during the 2010s austerity period. This resulted in an accumulated shortfall in capital investment (for buildings and scanners) and workforce staffing. By 2024, specialized public health budgets were slashed by 26% in real terms

This prolonged period of constrained funding is frequently cited as the root cause of record-high waiting lists, severe bed and staff shortages, and a growing crisis in social care. You can read a detailed breakdown of the NHS budget and spending history on The King's Fund and review the legacy of these policies on PubMed.


Steve
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Steve203 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (14) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community