Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (51) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: Newsom: We'll still do the tariffs
Date: 08/31/26 4:54 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 10
You're moving the goalposts. It's a matter of debate what *mechanism* is chosen to implement the tariffs. What's not a matter up for debate is that the democrats are just fine with implementing them in the first place. If they didn't want them Biden would have rescinded them immediately.

Tariffs have been used sporadically for decades. Maybe centuries. The fact that no ALL tariffs are rescinded under a given administration doesn't mean, or even imply, that the administration doesn't care about affordability. The tariffs of the past were to address unfair trade practices and as punitive measures as part of sanctions, on a very limited basis. In the case you cite, China.

You can mark this conversation if you like. If a Dem wins in 2028, almost all tariffs will disappear, except for very special cases like China (section 301) or those mandated by Congress. If I'm wrong, pull this up and gloat away.

They're the ones that walked away.

Because WE were being idiots. Demands that were non-starters right out of the gate. Restricting Canada's right to negotiate trade deals as a sovereign nation? Really? Plus pushing on domestic policies that were none of our business? Yeah, I would have walked away from the table, too.

They, as I pointed out in another thread, don't have the slightest idea how their own economy works.

I'm pretty sure they do. They actually have competent leaders who listen to experts (like economists). You may think their policies are stupid, and that's your right. But their economy is humming right along.

As an aside, the Felon is a boon for northeastern Canada. We were just there very recently, and the locals said that tourism is up more than 30% because people are avoiding the US for tourism. They're pretty happy about it.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to onepoorguy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (51) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community