Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84362 
Subject: Re: Faster but Vulnerable - Recess Appointment Edition
Date: 11/14/24 8:25 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 14
My main point still stands: he wants to hit the ground running and get things done. The democrats have zero interest in doing anything that would help him right the ship and as such will do everything in their power to block him asserting control over the federal government.

They're the opposition party. They disagree with him about what is necessary to "right the ship," and of course they will exercise what powers they have to oppose him pursuing policies that they disagree with. Which is what every opposition party does, by definition.

As we've discussed, the federal government is unlike any private business. The President doesn't have unilateral control over the federal government. He has the entirety of the Executive Power - but Congress sets the policies and writes the laws and establishes the structure and allocates the budget and reviews the appointments of all of the officers of all of those agencies. The President is not the only one in charge of the government.

This is incredibly frustrating to people who conceive of the President as if he were the head of a company, because that's not how private companies are set up. But the intent - the entire purpose - of this framework is to allow Congress to serve as a check and restraint on the President's power. The fact that Congresscritters are using that check will undoubtedly irritate the President and his supporters, but that's the way the government is set up. But they also won their elections, and so they get to exercise the power of their offices.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (34) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community