Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of BRK.ABest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Stocks A to Z / Stocks B / Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |
Author: Manlobbi 🐝🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 21944 
Subject: Re: WB philanthropy
Date: 02/11/23 11:36 AM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 32
Glad to see you here

Me to, though the wording is very understated! Rationalwalk besides being a fine person was one of the most creative Berkshire Hathaway analysts here in the past.

If I may purely speculate from what I perceived at the time, rationalwalk left - 100% understandably - because of a combination of high noise levels, and incessant rudeness toward him (in one word, insensitivity).

I posted far less but likewise left somewhat later for similar reasons and started the 'Manlobbi's Descent' board there a year or so after publishing the book in 2016.

Some others also left the Berkshire board when there were periods of high noise, but didn't return.

Echoing what others have observed, the noise levels here have reduced quite a lot. Noise down, politeness up.

Thank you to rationalwalk for any post, and thank you to everyone here for keeping the atmosphere at Shrewd'm more curious, respectful and meticulous (with the converse being than crass, egotistical and lazy - seriously avoid these three).

Consequently such creative and intelligent (and actually psychologically 'normal') authors will enjoy to share their insights.

I write 'normal' because I expect that those that leave when observing narcissism are the normal ones and those that insinuate nastiness, remain and brag about how thick skinned they are, are often the abnormal traumatised ones.

Also please remember that the 'ignore user' (clicking the unhappy yellow face) feature can be useful. I can say however, thankfully, it has almost not been used at all thus far. This is another very good omen.

- Manlobbi
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Manlobbi here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 21,448 posts about Berkshire Hathaway. The article-length ones it recommended most:
BRK: Why Not XOM? · 62 recs · 2024
Second quarter comments · 60 recs · 2023
Berkshire's Profit Contributors · 57 recs · 2023
Summary of 2Q 2026 · 54 recs · 2026
3Q Summary · 53 recs · 2024
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (13) |


Announcements
Berkshire Hathaway FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of BRK.A | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community