Post #12185 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 2

Overturning Chevron doesn't require Congress to provide more specificity or precision in their statutes. They're perfectly free to continue passing high level goals and allowing the agencies to flesh out the details, no matter what happens with Chevron. It would simply mean that when a statute is vague, the agency's read of the statute doesn't get any deference in a dispute. - albaby

----------------

Sure. My hope would be that without the Chevron thumb on the scale, the regulatory agencies would be more careful and responsive to citizen input knowing they may be forced in court to provide actual supporting evidence for what appears in their regulations.

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.