Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Post of the Week!
Search Politics


Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (47) |
Author: onepoorguy 🐝  😊 😞
Number: of 48447 
Subject: Re: Inheriting a far more dangerous world
Date: 09/24/2024 1:35 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 5
Agreed. I didn't see it at the time (i.e. that Afghani security forces would -in essence- flee the moment we left), but given that state of affairs, they were going to crumble no matter who was POTUS.

I would speculate that the convict would not have cared. He is, at his core, an isolationist. He wanted us out, and a lot of Americans agreed. What happened in Afghanistan after that, he wouldn't have (and doesn't) care. And, frankly, a lot of Americans don't care. I think at least some of the convict's popularity stems from a resurgent isolationism in this country. Which is why Putin and Xi would love another convict presidency.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (47) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds