Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (31) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84361 
Subject: Re: Venezuelan Oil Investment
Date: 01/10/26 9:10 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 11
Trump wants China out of the western hemisphere. He'd rather US oil companies be the ones rebuilding Venezuela than Chinese ones.

Then perhaps he shouldn't have gutted the foreign aid apparatus.

China's able to use Belt and Road to gain influence around the globe because it is implemented by the government. It's an exercise of soft power using the economic resources of their government, so the government chooses how to allocate the funds.

But if you're trying to do the same thing with private companies, it won't work. To recycle a quote from another discussion of this topic, “[i]nvestors don’t care about energy dominance. They care about energy dividends,” said Clay Seigle, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

That's why China's been able to use the BRI to develop allies and establish 'client' states around the world - they're willing to provide economic resources for reasons other than making a profit. They're using their economic resources to advance geopolitical strategic goals. But private U.S. oil companies aren't going to make those decisions that way.

As a much broader observation, there is a difference between the goals of the Administration and the likely outcomes of the things they're actually doing. Trump might want U.S. oil companies to rebuild Venezuela. But this conversation is mostly about whether that's actually going to be the result of what we're doing. If you allow the existing regime to remain in place, try to keep oil prices low globally, and don't commit large amounts of U.S. public funds to "nation building" in Venezuela, you're unlikely to get what the Administration wants.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (31) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community