Post #41387 by onepoorguy on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 1

...instead would be more concerned about winning swing seats, then they wouldn't be in this situation.

Easier said than done. But I agree. They need to get more swing seats. How to do that if you can't show people you try to fight for them? Then they go for the nationalist candidate, as they did. They apparently will only learn it was a bad idea after the fact, and vote the other way in four years (hopefully). But if Dems don't fight for them, why would they vote for them?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (35)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.