Post #53049 by Lapsody on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

As an aside, I am curious why Trump gave a sweetheart deal to an individual convicted of sex tracking AND why releasing the Epstein files are a “very hostile act to the administration.” I don’t perceive these to be the actions of an innocent person.

I agree, but the possibility that AL has it right is not zero. I'm just pondering a discussion with Bondi that there is no there there, and Trump's name comes up a few more times. In that scenario, an episode or two that we don't know about and more references to Trump's name, with little about anyone else - just how would people react to that?

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (15)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.