Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of PoliticsBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |
Author: albaby1 SILVER
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 84346 
Subject: Re: Biden Snubs Mayor Adans
Date: 12/27/23 4:59 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 7
One hallmark of the immigration debate is for those who favor open border to egg on illegal immigration, watch the flood start, then throw up their hands and blame Republicans.

But that's not what we're doing, in this thread. I'm trying to have a conversation with you.

Immigration law is set by Congress, as is the budget for any measures that might be taken to deal with immigrants. The President is in charge of administering those laws and resources, but at the end of the day they have only limited ability to affect the flow of asylum seekers. That's why Trump wasn't able to do it. Asylum seekers flooded the U.S. in 2019, because Trump couldn't build walls or have the Border Patrol use force to stop them or have Mexico keep them from reaching the border. Apprehensions in FY 2019 doubled to nearly a million. The Great Border Crisis began under Trump, not Biden....

cbp.gov - Sw border migration

What saved Trump's bacon on that issue was Covid. He was able to use the public health powers of the CDC to block immigrants that normally would have been allowed under U.S. law to maintain a presence in the U.S. pending their asylum claims. But that's not an option anymore - not only has the pandemic ebbed away from any claim to be able to use that authority, but the SCOTUS has adopted a much stricter view of those types of emergency powers. Title 42 isn't available to Biden, and it won't be available to Trump.

So seriously - what specifically do you think the administration ought to be doing? This isn't a "blame Republicans" question. If the Administration is doing something significantly wrong, as you're suggesting, what is it that they ought to be doing differently?
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to albaby1 here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 84,309 posts about US Policy. The article-length ones it recommended most:
It's going to get worse · 33 recs · 2025
G’day Donny · 30 recs · 2026
Old Related Story · 28 recs · 2026
HCR is a national treasure · 27 recs · 2025
Fascism in America · 27 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (41) |


Announcements
US Policy FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Politics | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community