Hi, Shrewd!        Login  
Shrewd'm.com 
A merry & shrewd investing community
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd
Search
Shrewd'm.com Merry shrewd investors
Search
Best Of MacroBest OfAll BoardsThe Shrewd’m WeeklyLearn to InvestHow to Become Shrewd


The week's question
In December 2024, in the thread "Re: BRK: Why Not XOM?", BreckHutHigh asked the members: "What about the long road trips with kids?" This week it is put to everyone again. The button below opens the small thread re-asking it - read what others have said so far, then give your own answer as an ordinary reply.
Answer this questionContinue to Shrewd'mThis note won't appear again
Personal Finance / Macroeconomic Trends & Risks
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |
Author: Goofyhoofy 🐝 HONORARY
SHREWD
  😊 😞

Number: of 4460 
Subject: Re: OT: Typical flip
Date: 06/07/26 12:05 PM
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
No. of Recommendations: 13
For obvious reasons, a ground attack against Iran would be a significant challenge

To say the least. For the Gulf War we used Saudi Arabia, and to a lesser extent UAE and Kuwait to stage supplies, bases, and personnel in the hundreds of thousands. At the moment Saudi Arabia and UAE are denying us use of our airbases in their countries to attack Iran (even by air), and Kuwait is denying that we are using Kuwaiti bases (because they don’t want to be on the wrong side of Iran either.)

So before you plan a ground invasion you have to have somewhere to invade from - like England during World War II or the Japanese islands in the Pacific which we fought for with increasing casualties the closer we got.

There is no way to invade short of putting hundreds of thousands of troops in harms way (Desert Storm involved almost 700,000) and we’re just not gonna do it. Trump won’t do it because he’s all hat, no cattle. Congress won’t do it because they would be running for their lives. The military would advise against it because it’s hopeless, but they would do it if ordered because that’s what they do, unfortunately.

No, we are not going to “attack.” You are right, Trump is groping for a way out, and there isn’t one except surrender, so he has to figure out a way to surrender while calling it a great victory, in which he will be aided by his accomplices in the right-wing media.

This is a loss, straight up. Bibi has tried to convince every President since ever to do it, only Trump was stupid enough to say yes.
Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!
Print the post
Members reply directly to Goofyhoofy here — and replies get answered. Reading is free; so is joining the conversation. Join Shrewd'm »
This community has written 4,454 posts about Macroeconomic Trends & Risks. The article-length ones it recommended most:
AI Tarpits · 36 recs · 2026
End of an era - profit slowdown · 36 recs · 2023
Control Panel: Trend changes in 2026 · 34 recs · 2026
From the Oregon Bay Area (a blogger) · 33 recs · 2025
Lerner Symmetry Theorem · 32 recs · 2025
Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (10) |


Announcements
Macroeconomic Trends & Risks FAQ
Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

Best Of Macro | Best Of | Favourites & Replies | All Boards | Followed Shrewds | Open Questions | Moving a community