Post #5548 by bighairymike on the US Policy board

Halls of Shrewd'm / US Policy ❤

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24)

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

No. of Recommendations: 3

AMA suggests taxpayers should fund $100,000 to $300,000 Uterus Transplant surgeries. I suppose we have to pony up the cash since "science"

Loony logic from the article,

"Transwomen lack a trait (the ability to bear children) that may cause them to experience psychological dissonance in a way that undermines their health and well-being," the ethics paper says. "The lack of a uterus also closes off the prospect of gestating a child in a way that is available to women as a class. It follows that lack of a uterus is an obstacle to full participation in the social goods "

My opinion, transwomen are deep into psychological dissonance without a uterus and still will be with one.

Also, what are the "social goods attached to women's identity."?

Full article here

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/healthca...

Post New | Post Reply | Report Post | Recommend It!

Print the post

Unthreaded | Threaded | Whole Thread (24)

Prev | Next

Announcements

US Policy FAQ

Contact Shrewd'm
Contact the developer of these message boards.

A community forum supporting civilized, and highly helpful, self-educating investors that come together for Shrewdness and merry spirits. These message boards closely follow the look and feel of the old message boards at boards.fool.com prior to the boards redirected to discussion.fool.com. Shrewd'm is not affiliated with the comprehensive and excellent investment website, The Motley Fool (TMF), in any way. The Shrewd commmunity here has owed, and continues to owe, gratitude to The Motley Fool for nurturing a culture of jovial irreverence towards Wall St, and that tradition will continue here.